Page 42 - 2016年线缆竞争力报告(摘要版)
P. 42

《2016年中国线缆行业最具竞争力企业10强》竞争力报告(摘要版)39

Chart4-2-1 The standard value of sales revenues in comparison of the top 10 competitiveness enterprises in the
                                                     wire and cable industry of China

 

                                                                      Sales revenues (18%)
               


                                  

                                                                              

                                                                                   

                                                             Zhongli          Tongling Jingda

        Hengtong Shangshang  Baosheng  ZTT  Jiangnan  Hanhe Cable           Futong                   Wanma

Chart 4-2-2 The standard value of net assets in comparison of the top 10 competitiveness enterprises in the wire and cable
               industry of China

Chart 4-2-3 The standard value of net profit in comparison of the top 10 competitiveness enterprises in the wire and cable
               industry of China

Chart 4-2-4 The standard value of return on total assets in comparison of the top 10 competitiveness enterprises in wire and cable
               industry of China

Chart 4-2-5 The standard value of return on net assets in comparison of the top 10 competitiveness enterprises in the wire and cable
               industry of China

Chart 4-2-6 The standard value of sales revenues contribution per employee in comparison of the top 10 competitiveness enterprises in the
               wire and cable industry of China

Chart 4-2-7 The standard value of ratio of international revenues to total sales revenues in comparison of the top 10 competitiveness
               enterprises in the wire and cable industry of China

Chart 4-2-8 The standard value of average growth rate of sales revenues for the last three years in comparison of the top 10
               competitiveness enterprises in wire and cable industry of China

Chart 4-2-9 The standard value of average growth rate of net profit for the last three years in comparison of the top 10 competitiveness
               enterprises in the wire and cable industry of China

………… 【Please refer to "The competitiveness report on 'the Top 10 competitiveness enterprises in the wire and cable
industry of China during 2015-2016' (integrated edition)" for details】

2 The analysis of the enterprise competitiveness status of the top 10 competitiveness enterprises in the wire
and cable industry

   Chart 4-2-10 The competitiveness analysis chart of Hengtong in 2016
   Chart 4-2-11 The competitiveness analysis chart of Shangshang in 2016
   Chart 4-2-12 The competitiveness analysis chart of Baosheng in 2016
   Chart 4-2-13 The competitiveness analysis chart of ZTT in 2016
   Chart 4-2-14 The competitiveness analysis chart of Jiangnan in 2016
   Chart 4-2-15 The competitiveness analysis chart of Hanhe in 2016
   Chart 4-2-16 The competitiveness analysis chart of Zhongli in 2016
   Chart 4-2-17 The competitiveness analysis chart of Futong Group in 2016
   Chart 4-2-18 The competitiveness analysis chart of Tongling Jingda in 2016
   Chart 4-2-19 The competitiveness analysis chart of Wanma in 2016
   ………… 【Please refer to "The competitiveness report on 'the Top 10 competitiveness enterprises in the wire and cable
   industry of China during 2015-2016' (integrated edition)" for details】

3 The analysis of the strength and weakness of the top 10 competitiveness enterprises in the wire and cable industry

   The financial data of competitiveness is formed by 9 indicators of certain weight, and the strength and weakness indicators are different
in each company. We classify the 9 indicators into 2 categories: one is higher than the competitiveness score of the enterprise, that is, these
indicators improve the enterprise competitiveness, we call them the strength indicators; otherwise, they are weakness indicators. What the
readers should be reminded is that we classify the categories by the standard value of financial data in enterprise competitiveness, but not
   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47