Page 44 - 2016年线缆竞争力报告(摘要版)

《2016年中国线缆行业最具竞争力企业10强》竞争力报告（摘要版）41

Hard indicator of relevant financial data in the top 20 competitiveness enterprises in the wire and cable industry of China in
2016 are divided to the scale sub-factors, efficiency sub-factors and growth sub-factors. In order to make it easier for analysis and
comparison, we make the following tables and charts.

1 The standard value of financial data in comparison of 9 individual indicators among the top 20 enterprises
in the wire and cable industry of China

Chart 4-3-1 The standard value of sales revenues in comparison of the top 20 enterprises in the wire and cable industry of China
Chart 4-3-2 The standard value of net assets in comparison of the top 20 competitiveness enterprises in the wire and cable

industry of China
Chart 4-3-3 The standard value of net profit in comparison of the top 20 competitiveness enterprises in the wire and cable

industry of China
Chart 4-3-4 The standard value of return on total assets in comparison of the top 20 competitiveness enterprises in wire and cable

industry of China
Chart 4-3-5 The standard value of return on net assets in comparison of the top 20 competitiveness enterprises in the wire and cable

industry of China
Chart 4-3-6 The standard value of sales revenues contribution per employee in comparison of the top 20 competitiveness enterprises in the

wire and cable industry of China
Chart 4-3-7 The standard value of ratio of international revenues to total sales revenues in comparison of the top 20 competitiveness

enterprises in the wire and cable industry of China
Chart 4-3-8 The standard value of average growth rate of sales revenues for the last three years in comparison of the top 20

competitiveness enterprises in wire and cable industry of China
Chart 4-3-9 The standard value of average growth rate of net profit for the last three years in comparison of the top 20 competitiveness

enterprises in the wire and cable industry of China
………… 【Please refer to "The competitiveness report on 'the Top 10 competitiveness enterprises in the wire and cable
industry of China during 2015-2016' (integrated edition)" for details】

2 The analysis of the enterprise competitiveness status of the top 20 enterprises in the wire and cable industry of China

Chart 4-3-10 The competitiveness analysis chart of Sun Cable in 2016
Chart 4-3-11 The competitiveness analysis chart of Goldcup Electric Apparatus in 2016
Chart 4-3-12 The competitiveness analysis chart of Yanggu Cable in 2016
Chart 4-3-13 The competitiveness analysis chart of Zhongchao in 2016
Chart 4-3-14 The competitiveness analysis chart of Hangzhou Cable in 2016
Chart 4-3-15 The competitiveness analysis chart of Tongding in 2016
Chart 4-3-16 The competitiveness analysis chart of TBEA in 2016
Chart 4-3-17 The competitiveness analysis chart of Yuancheng Cable in 2016
Chart 4-3-18 The competitiveness analysis chart of Lanzhou Zhongbang Cable in 2016
Chart 4-3-19 The competitiveness analysis chart of Aerospace Electric in 2016
………… 【Please refer to "The competitiveness report on 'the Top 20 competitiveness enterprises in the wire and cable
industry of China during 2015-2016' (integrated edition)" for details】

3 The analysis of strength and weakness of the top 20 enterprises in the wire and cable industry of China

The financial data of competitiveness is formed by 9 indicators of certain weight, and the strength and weakness indicators are different
in each company. We classify the 9 indicators into 2 categories: one is higher than the competitiveness score of the enterprise, that is, these
indicators improve the enterprise competitiveness, we call them the strength indicators; otherwise, they are weakness indicators. What the
readers should be reminded is that we classify the categories by the standard value of financial data in enterprise competitiveness, but not the
average score of the whole industry. For example, Shangshang’s standard value of the sales revenues is 0.9213, above the average value, but
below the standard value of the enterprise competitiveness, 2.0445, thus we put it into weakness indicators. In the table 4-2-2, the strength
indicator is labeled by “↑”, and weakness indicator by “↓”. With the indicators divided into 2 categories, the enterprises can pay more attention
to their weakness ones, which orient their effort to improve their competitiveness. Shangshang, for instance, should be more concerned with
increase sub-factors. As for the order of the indicators to draw attention, you can refer to the indicators of the enterprise’s specific data to
determine.